Wednesday 15 April 2015

fight club

Fight Club - Critical Approaches

  • Crisis of Masculinity
  • Freudian
  • Postmodernism
  • Nietzchean
Andrew walker review of Fight Club
Objectives

  • To understand how to apply critical approaches for exam questions
  • To be able to apply critical approaches to a short sequence from the film.
  • To demonstrate an ability to respond correctly within written analysis.
How to approach your exam answer for Section C: 'Fight Club"
Don't explain the theory APPLY IT!!!!!
Don't be overtly descriptive, just state the scene: e.g Jack goes to the dentists. Not he goes to the dentist and meets his friend and goes out for coffee afterwards.
Respond in a personal way - what have You taken from it?

Polysemy

"Each text is seen to generate a potentially infinite range of meanings"

Crisis of Masculinity

Henry Giroux says its a failed critique which focuses on consumerist culture and how it shapes male identity and ignores how neoliberal capitalism has dominated and exploited society.

The film assumes that capitalism and consumerism are "impenetrable", and there cannot be resistance or struggle against them.
it focuses instead on defending "authoritarian masculinity" The fight clubs' violence are complicit with the system of commodification that it denounces because it ties into instant gratification, heightened competitiveness, and "the market-driven desire" to dominate and win in fights.
Fight Club ascribes to a world under the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes in which cynicism replaces hope.

Wednesday 18 March 2015

Frame rate:
https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/3/930510

How to create a tilt shift effect:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJJYbO1OVcM

Wednesday 25 February 2015

Creative Project Notes

Schedule:

1. Preparation start: 1st February 
2. Filming start: 11th February (Berlin: establishing shots, montage sequence)
3. New York shots: 5th March - 10th March
4. Editing: 25th February - 20th March
5. In-house evaluation of project: 13th March
6. Any additional last-minute filming: 13th March - 20th March
7. Reflective analysis start: Friday 20th March LATEST!!!! (sooner the better)
 Deadline: Friday 27th march 

Don't worry about budget or scope. Aim for the best outcome.
Defy and challenge conventions.
Intrigue.

Planning: Plan out all shots before New York.

Technical decisions:
Aspect Ratio?: Will it change during the shoot? Which ratio is best suited to the film genre/period/meaning etc? 2.35 : 1?


Reflective Analysis:


  • Mention how continuity errors accrued - How I could fix them? (Could considered actually removing them)
  • Be specific to the shot, mention the intention, meaning, outcome, how well it worked. How could it be improved?




Creative ideas:


Potential Narratives: 
Misunderstood Stalker? (Twist: turns out to be himself)
Deranged individual - Serial Killer
Fake Documentary (e.g. The Blair Witch Project, The Impostor), 
Exposition

Short film based upon the messages of Arcade Fire's 'Reflektor':
  1. Things aren't always how the appear in films/tv/online (The Truth)
  2. The people's lack of trust in the government (NSA's PRISM program)
  3. Inspired by the styles of Sans Soleil/Koyaanisqatsi



Film opens up with a low angle shot of the up above Mac Desktop Computer.
As 'Reflektor: Instrumental' starts to play, the monitor starts to come on and display an image of New York


Genre: 
Black Comedy Drama, Sci-fi?

Editing:
Could apply artificial film grain to evoke a time period.
Slick Scene transitions
Voiceover
Title Sequence (This establishes the tone of the film: it must reflect it. Think of Birdman's title sequence)

Context:
It's freezing in New York at the moment
I'll have no other people besides my family to direct in New York
Story based around my family or a member in particular.
My role: Director/Writer/Cinematographer/Actor?/Camera Operator
How can College be utilised?: Film projector could be used as a backdrop/cinema sequence

Shots:
Time lapses - from New York Hotel window (Times Square)
Establishing
Slight zoom in on the characters' interactions/reactions (Modern Family Style)

Mise-en-scene/Props:
Get Dad to bring one of Jonathan's cars home?
Borrow Martin's gun? (Cant take to new york though)
Lighting - Natural, non natural? low key/high key? 

Soundtrack:
Songs (Think about pacing, diegetic/non-diegetic):
'Wolves' - Kanye West (Themes: dystopia, evil, love, redemption...)
'Reflector' - Arcade Fire (Themes: the new digital age, missing a loved one
Original soundtrack? Work with Anna to produce a score?

Friday 21 November 2014

FM3: Presentation Script






Presentation Script


- Introduction –





Projector: Still iconic image of Harvey Keitel (Mr White) standing over Steve Buscemi (Mr Pink) in Reservoir Dogs [4]


 


Speaker:


Ever since his directorial debut with ensemble heist film Reservoir Dog's [4], Tarantino has chosen strong, often morally conflicted characters to be at the centre of his tales of ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of vengeance’ [tagline of item 5]. However in 1997, he introduced a desire to produce specific female-driven films with his first adaptation and third feature-length film Jackie Brown [2]. I believe it’s this turning point in his career that has had the largest impact on the consideration of him as an auteur by his audience. Despite this, the director’s most universally acclaimed films (as aggregated by rottentomatoes.com) are Pulp-Fiction (94% approval), Reservoir Dogs (92%) and Django Unchained (88%) - all male-oriented films. So I ask this:


 


Projector displaying my hypothesis: ‘Does Quentin Tarantino's unconventional, yet persistent portrayal of strong, independent, anti-heroine characters within his filmography classify him as an auteur?’


 


Speaker:


Before we discuss reasons as to why Tarantino could be considered an auteur, we must first consider Auteurism as a whole and the reason it's used by so many when analysing and critiquing film. As explained by author Ian Stephens [7], its Tarantino's evolution as a filmmaker from his earlier work to work more focused upon the depth of his characters relationships and individual backstories, such as the case with Kill Bill, that has defined him as an auteur of cinema. Historically, the title of an
'Auteur' was given to a director that had their own individual style, Therefore, this will be the primary basis for explaining how Tarantino should 
be considered an auteur for his portrayal of female empowerment: inspired by those who have influenced him.



Speaker:


Quentin Tarantino is often considered an auteur of post-modernist filmmaking. His collaborative spirit, as showcased in the co-directed effort Grindhouse [17], could be the key to the success of his films. One could argue that it’s those who surround a director, such as the cast members, that can truly help bring characters off of the page, but only once they are allowed their own input. [9] His most infamous character is Kill Bill's former D.I.V.A.S. member Beatrix Kiddo who’s played by his close friend and ‘muse’ Uma Thurman. [1]


 


Projector: Image of The Deadly Viper Assassination Squad members standing over the busted Bride. ­­[1]


 


Thurman starred in Tarantino’s 1994 black comedy crime film Pulp Fiction. She plays a similar and seemingly in control character as that of Kiddo, named Mia Wallace - the wife of Gangster boss Marsellus Wallace. It is the idea of this character's brief story which audiences want to know about the most: according to Tarantino [13]. Interviews would suggest that Tarantino's most career-defining feature, Kill Bill Vol. 1 & Vol. 2, is a broadened take on Mia's intriguing unknown backstory in Pulp Fiction. Questions such as "How the hell does she even end up with Marsellus anyway? What is that about?" and "Is it a happy situation with Wallace? And if she's brought back from death, will there be any changes?" were the seeds planted in Tarantino's mind that lead him to answer these questions in Kill Bill. However, prior to this, Tarantino set his mind on a movie adaption of Elmore Leonard's novel Rum Punch, called Jackie Brown (1997) [2].


 


Projector: Clip of Jackie Brown [2] getting one over on Ordell Robbie. (46:00-53:25)


 


Speaker:


This scene opens up with Robbie silently watching Brown get dropped off at her home as he sits in his parked car across the street. This scene is an indication of Tarantino’s unconventional narrative style. Instead of the villain typically reaching for a gun as he opens up the glove box, as per the crime-genre convention, Ordell reaches for some gloves [7]. However, the next shot is of a gun on his passenger seat, thus displaying Tarantino playfulness with his audience’s expectations and view of Ordell. The location of his gun in particular suggests he will attempt to murder Jackie; he views her as an unfaithful accomplice, instead of a victim of an association to him. This is an example of how Tarantino makes his older male characters overbearing and dismissive of his passively-viewed leading women. [8]


 


Due to the prior actions of Ordell, it’s unsurprising that Jackie would be paranoid and aware of her surroundings (Ordell’s not-so-discreetly parked car). It’s also likely that she would be prepared for Ordell to knock at the door at any moment. But once again Ordell underestimates her and is caught off-guard once she holds a gun to his crotch. It’s at this point Jackie’s demeanour changes from passive to active; she takes control of the situation. [8] As per her dialogue, Jackie is willing to forgive Ordell’s actions, but from her conversation with Max the following morning, we learn that she is unwilling to forget. This unwillingness to forget is the added depth to her character which eventually leads to her victorious resolution. [9]


 


Projector: The following morning coffee with Max Cherry (scene clip). [8] (53:26-1:00:14)


 


The following morning-after scene is an effective juxtaposition [16] as it plays out oppositely to the previous. At first Jackie is active as she leads the conversation and tells Max to come inside and sit down. However, once the scene plays out she becomes more passive and appreciative of what Cherry has to say. The happiness of both of the characters once they’re together is evoked through high key lighting as opposed to the horror genre-evoking low key lighting of her time spent with Ordell.


 





 


In this scene we’re told of how, due to her financial situation and misfortune Jackie can’t afford anything new in her home. This scene is not eerily silent, it’s got uplifting music!


 


The true challenge Jackie faces, is not Ordell, but the road ahead if she gets busted again.


 


Jackie’s uplifting spirit is infectious as shown in the following police department scene. As opposed to their first aggregated meeting, Jackie is allowed to smoke in the cops’ office. All of the characters have smiles on their faces. The other cop (Michael Keaton) seems joyed to see her again. This scene shows how once you get to know someone such as Jackie; you grow in adoration towards them.


 


Projector: Insert video of Tarantino talking about the creation of Death Proof and Planet Terror with Robert Rodriguez [14] (00:24-00:29)


 


Speaker:

Tarantino is not afraid to create controversial films. He’s afraid to create films that fail to entertain and that have a lack of vision necessary in order to achieve a worthwhile conversation within his audience [14]. Films such as his own ‘Death Proof’ have been described by the director as being the latter, but Tarantino has learned from his mistakes. Whilst discussing the process of making Death Proof, Tarantino described himself and fellow ‘Grindhouse’ director Robert Rodriguez as being cocky and that they had gotten used to going off into uncharted territory and expecting people (referring to the audience) following them anywhere whilst in the process. Instead he wants to challenge his audience, and therefore himself, as he considers himself a part of the audience. After just coming off the back of what he considers one of his best film to date: Kill Bill Volume 2, Tarantino felt as if he was able to recreate the positive aspects of his childhood visions of 1970’s exploitation b-movies with ease. The film was met with a less than spectacular reaction. Following Death Proof, Tarantino instinctively decided to  stick with what he had learnt from his previous films and expand upon his experiences with the creation of Inglourious Basterds [3] that earned him eight Oscar nominations.




When it comes to the portrayal of Tarantino’s characters, the performances have consistently been second to none [15]. In order to achieve such performances such as all of those in Inglourious Basterds, Tarantino has said: “I think you should be sitting right by the camera [as a director] - I actually think one of the best things for a film director to be doing in this modern day is to not be viewing it [the take] in video village” [17]. By this, I think he means to say that when actors are directly facing the director, they are only acting for them in that moment, as opposed to the audience later on in the theatre. It is this desired personal connection with the director that I think makes Tarantino a true auteur. Many other directors considered to be auteurs such as Christopher Nolan, in my opinion, will often times fail to achieve such memorable and spectacular performances due to a lack of connection through being in a different room altogether watching a monitor for the sake of ease.

Projector: Clip of Shosana's projected face in the burning French cinema [3] (2:23:22-2:25:45)

Speaker:
In her last appearance on screen, after her death just seconds prior, a close-up head shot of the lead females face is projected over an audience of confused Nazi's in the burning French cinema scene of Inglourious Basterds. The style of her message is a clear visual reference to George Orwell's "Nineteen eighty-four" character Big Brother. Shosana is given apparent power over the viewers fate in the theatr­­­e: much like Tarantino's auteuristic control over the audiences of his films. Similarly to how Big Brother is viewed by the citizens of Oceania, Shosana is also viewed as the "benevolent protector of all citizens" to Inglourious Basterds' audience. All in the theatre must die in her eyes.

 


 


 







Notes:


In conclusion, whilst I do think that the use of strong females in his films do contribute to the authenticity of his authorship, it is clearly not the defining element. Tarantino has proven that being an auteur is not about having everything on screen be your specific view, instead it is the realisation and fulfilment of your individual intentions.





For example, the cinematography is strategically void of ‘male-gazes’, which would indicate Tarantino’s respect and sense of maturity towards the ever-present female characters of the film; a distinctive difference in comparison to other ‘female empowerment’ flicks such as Tomb Rader. [13]








Kill Bill is, in my opinion Tarantino’s best work, just not in its current structural form of two volumes. The biggest problem with Kill Bill is its structure of events shown to the audience. Most of the directors desired suspense with the audience in his scenes is not fulfilled due to their juxtaposition.









 


In this scene, The Bride tells Bill why she chose to stay away from him: she fell pregnant (it was a form of redemption). She states: “Before that strip turned blue… …I was a woman, I was your woman. I was a killer who killed for you. Before that strip turned blue, I would’ve jumped a motorcycle onto a speeding train. For you. But once that strip turned blue… …I could no longer do any of those things. Not anymore. Because I was gonna be a mother. Can you understand that?


Yes. But why didn’t you tell me then, instead of now?


Once you knew, you’d claim her. And I didn’t want that.


Not your decision to make.


Yes. But it’s the right decision, and I made it for my daughter. – She deserved to be born with a clean slate. But with you, she would’ve been born into a world she shouldn’t have. I had to choose. I chose her. You know, five years ago, if I had to make a list of impossible things that could never happen, you performing a coup de grace on me by bustin’ a cap in my crown, it would have been right at the top of the list. I would’ve been wrong, wouldn’t I?


 


·         Tarantino has proven that being an auteur is not about having everything on screen be your specific view, instead it is the realisation and fulfilment of your individual intentions.


Tarantino isn’t afraid to create controversial films. He’s afraid to create films that fail to entertain and that have a lack of vision pieces, pieces in which he describes as being cocky and that they (himself and Rodrigues) had gotten used to going off into uncharted territory and people (referring to the audience) following them anywhere whilst in the process of creation such as with his 2007 grindhouse inspired film Death Proof. Instead he wants to challenge his audience, and hence himself as he considers himself a part of the audience. After just coming off the back of what he considers one of his best films to date: Kill Bill Volume 2, Tarantino felt as if he was confident yet cocky when it came to creating a grindhouse film, instead what he created was


Despite being confident in his ideas, Tarantino always craves the thoughts and opinions of others regarding any aspect of the filmmaking process


The Director’s Chair interview:


Reasons why it’s great to put in the catalogue:


1. Tarantino sits down with his close friend of more than 25 years to discuss a passion for filmmaking they both share. Hence, it is a lot less formal than most interviews that Tarantino has done. It gives him a chance to feel more relaxed and open to share his true thoughts.


2. Tarantino discusses new topics, never before discussed in other interviews or media.


3. Never before seen clips of Tarantino on set and talking to Rodrigues are shown. This offers further insight into the creation of his films and how much of an auteur he is on set.


Tarantino quote (the directors chair part 2)


“In the case of like, say, Jackie Brown, I have to, you know be careful of how I say this because, I absolutely love Jackie Brown – It’s one of my best movies, I think it’s really, really terrific. I have a deep affection for it. Having said that I don’t really think I was put on earth to really adapt other peoples novels” – In this one quote, Tarantino expresses his desire to be a true auteur of film: creating his own films entirely based off his on thoughts and stories from his own experiences.


Tarantino: “I was there to face the blank page- I was there to start from nothing- that is my movie, that is what I am really here to do.”


In response to Rodrigues’ question on why Tarantino wanted to take many different visual languages of film such as anime, samurai and spaghetti western and use them as tools in one film, Kill Bill, Tarantino replied: “My goal was Kill Bill as one unit, not Kill Bill one and two, but Kill Bill as the way I wrote it and the way I shot it: as one”. This conversation showcases how sometimes Tarantino’s desires can not always become a reality


“I see the movie in my mind” “Before I watch the movie I have a genuine vision for the film and I am doing that vision – how I see it.”


On how he achieves such great performances from his actors Tarantino states:


“I think you should be sitting right by the camera [as a director]” “I actually think one of the best things for a film director to be doing in this modern day is to not be viewing it [the take] in video village” – meaning as to not be watching them act via a monitor far away or in a whole other room from where the scene is taking place.


“If you watch the acting, right next to the camera, right in front of the actors, it’s as if they are acting just and solely and utterly only for you”


“Kill Bill was insanely personal. I don’t necessarily want you to know why it’s so damn personal and why its ripped from my heart and my soul, I wanna create a little subterfuge” “But it’s still all very real, it’s still all coming from me”.



 


Wednesday 24 September 2014

'La Haine' Practice Question

5. How far does the impact of the films you have studied for this topic depend on distinctive uses of film techniques.

Introduction

'La Haine' is a 1995 french crime/drama/suspense film directed by Mathieu Kassovitz that depicts the lives of three french youth boys living in the outskirt banlieues of Paris in tower blocks named 'The Projects' in English translation. The words 'La Haine' translate to 'Hate' in English, an aspects in which the film tries to portray The
film was shot in colour but later edited to be viewed in black & white. This use of black & white evokes the film noir genre of film that was popular in America throughout the 1940's and 1950's that originated from German Expressionist cinematography.
   

   One film technique that is quite often present in this film is the use of a three shot to capture the three main characters, Vinz, Hubert and Saïd as one entity such as the mixture of races within the area of France in which the film was shot. This three shot often places Saïd, a Maghrebi, in the middle of Vinz, a raging rebel Jew, and Hubert, an Afro-French boxer and small-time drug dealer, as he is suggested to be the middle ground of the two's backgrounds, despite not ever seeing his own background and the one who often times must choose who's side to pick when they are in disagreement. Generally the person who is leading the group at a particular time or in a situation, will be positioned in front of the other two.

   The film achieves a sense of the characters not feeling that they belong in the audiences mind by using a shallow depth of field. This technique in specific is predominant when the trio visit the centre of Paris. A loud non-diegetic gunshot is also often heard during the transitioning cuts between different scenes of the film. This gunshot foreshadows the suspenseful ending of the film in which it is suggested that either Hubert or a corrupt police officer is shot by the other, or both perhaps off screen. Another reoccurring technique, and foreshadowing of a tragic change in the lives of the characters, is the use of a non-diegetic ticking digital clock between each scene throughout the 19 consecutive hours of which the film is set. This clock resembles the sound of a ticking time-bomb, it is also another technique which is present in the last shot (and scene) of the film that helps build suspense.
   

   The documentary style of film making used by Kassovitz that utilised zooms in on acts of violence from a far and handheld camera movement that allowed the audience to feel as though they were actual spectators of the violence, was criticised by some audience members and critics for contributing to a false portrayal of those living in the banlieues of Paris, and giving France in general a bad name. Despite these criticisms, the director, in my opinion at least, actually manages to portray real-life Paris of the time very well as events depicted in the film are very similar to those documented, such as rioting amongst the suburban male youth.

Notes:

The lighting in the film ranges from natural to highly stylistic and artificial. Chiaroscuro, a staple of film noir lighting, is also strongly present when the characters are in a troubled situation. 

I think that the use of black and white by the director to portray this story, is...
Sources:
http://www.criterion.com/current/posts/642-la-haine-and-after-arts-politics-and-the-banlieue

Friday 12 September 2014

FM3 Small Scale Research Project - Quentin Tarantino

Does Quentin Tarantino's unconventional yet persistent portrayal of strong, independent, anti-heroine characters within his filmography classify him as an auteur?

Films:

Item 1
'KILL BILL' VOL. 1 & 2 (2003) - Director/Writer: Quentin Tarantino

I chose both parts of Kill Bill focus' for my presentation as they offer the majority of evidence within my research in order to prove and support my hypothesis. I also consider the two films as one: like how they were originally intended by the director. Despite the splitting of the film into two by Miramax due to risk of the extended length resulting in a smaller audience, Tarantino has stated that he shot more footage than he originally intended and agreed to split the film. Therefore, this does not go against Tarantino being considered a true auteur. The main character of the film, played by Uma Thurman, is simply referred to as 'The Bride' throughout. Thurman previously starred as Mia Wallace - another strong minded and exuberant character in what is considered Tarantino's masterpiece: Pulp Fiction. The Bride is seen as the underdog from the very first frame of the film. However, once she sets out on a quest for revenge after being shot by her ex-lover assassin, Bill, on the rehearsal of her wedding day, she becomes a true anti-heroine. Despite being the second in Tarantino's filmography to feature a strong leading female, the film takes priority due to it's original screenplay that makes it personal to the director.  

Item 2
'Jackie Brown' (1997) - Director/Writer: Quentin Tarantino

I have chosen to use this film as the main character 'Jackie Brown' (played by Pam Grier) draws similarities to the directors' independent mother. Having grown up without a predominate father figure, Tarantino often makes the main villain in his films a mysterious older male (Marsellus of Pulp Fiction, Bill of Kill Bill and Hans of Inglourious Basterds etc.). This is also the case with Jackie Brown. Tarantino's changes to Elmore Leonard's novel, such as the main character's race. This shows his need to make the story in his own auteurist vision.

Item 3
'Inglourious Basterds' (2009) - Director/Writer: Quentin Tarantino

This World War II film also showcases many different views of women as seen by themselves and its male characters. The main character of the film is Jewish-born Shosana. Numerous elements of the story make Shosana seem powerful, focused and in control of her mission, all whilst constantly under Nazi occupation of France. In her last appearance on screen, after her death just seconds prior, a projected extreme close-up head shot message of Shosana describing her revenge to a confused audience of Nazi's is shown. The style of this message is a clear visual reference to George Orwell's "Nineteen eighty-four" character Big Brother. Therefore, Shosana is given apparent power over the viewers fate in the theatre: much like Tarantino's auteuristic control over his films audiences enjoyment. Much like how Big Brother is viewed by the citizens of Oceania, Shosana is also viewed as the "benevolent protector of all citizens", thus all in the theatre must die in her eyes.

Scripts:

Item 4
'Django Unchained Script' (2012) - Writer: Quentin Tarantino

I have chosen to include the script of Tarantino's 2012 slavery based spaghetti western instead of the actual finished film as the portrayal of Django's wife Broomhilda is more inspiring and developed due to the inclusion of an essential character building scene that made her character seem less like a damsel in distress and more of a force to be reckoned with, thus she's another example of a strong Tarantino female heroine.


Articles:

Item 5
'4 Evolutions of Women in Quentin Tarantino Movies Roused by the Want for Revenge' - By Gemma Mary-Louise

I've chosen to use this item as I feel the writer makes a lot of varied points regarding how often Tarantino makes the vengeance-pursuing women of his films seem at first passive and then active. They also makes note-worthy points of how the director combines visuals and dialogue to evoke a feeling of empathy towards these women within the audience, despite knowing that they are not always the character we should be rooting for, which makes them anti-heroines.

Item 6
'Revenge of the Pussycats: An Ode to Tarantino and His Women' - By Bitch Flicks

This item was chosen as it details how the women of Tarantino's films compare to those of other auteurs. The publisher makes great points of why it is important and significant for Tarantino to make his female characters not just one-dimensional fighters but strong minded, unique characters with intriguing backgrounds such as that of Shosana in Inglourious Basterds.

Item 7
'From Script To Screen: The 12 Biggest Deleted/Un-filmed Scenes From 'Django Unchained'' - By Drew Taylor

I felt that this item would be useful to include in my catalogue as it details all of the changes made from the script to the screen, such as the removal of a lot of Broomhilda's (Kerry Washington) backstory. They also reason in detail why this was such as blow to the outcome and perception of Washington's character and thus the film. Through research I have discovered that this is the case for other critics who have read the script. The article also describes a lot of different theories as to why Tarantino did not include these scenes.

Item 8
'How Leonard's Jackie Burke Became Tarantino's Jackie Brown' - By Meredith Borders

This article was an interesting insight into the Elmore Leonard novel Rum Punch that was adapted by Tarantino. The writer, who read the novel prior to viewing Tarantino's version, details how Leonard told Tarantino he appreciated the changes made as he felt it was important for it to be Tarantino's own vision.

Reviews

Item 9
'Jackie Brown Movie Review & Film Summary' - Roger Ebert review

This review makes good notes on how Tarantino is great at casting the women, such as Pam Grier in his films, something in which is not always present in most crime-thrillers. Ebert also details why he thinks Tarantino is "the real thing" i.e. an auteur in control of his craft as opposed to a puppet controlled by an organisation.

Item 10
'Jackie Brown Movie Review' - Peter Travers for Rolling Stone

I find this review to be worthwhile due to how it makes connections to Tarantino's history and his adoration for the history of Blaxploitation that emerged when he was young. Interestingly, it notes how Tarantino viewed Grier as someone with a maverick spirit and timeless presence on screen and off, despite being written off by most critics due to her involvement in many films described as "gore junk". This shows Tarantino's ability to think differently in regards to the actors he works with. Another example is John Travolta in Pulp Fiction. At the time of developing Pulp Fiction, Travolta's career was on a downward trajectory since 'Grease'. Despite this, Tarantino was able to see beyond his falling success, realise his talent and what he could bring to the film.


Video:

Item 11
'Sally Menke, Editor (1953 - 2010)' - By Jim Emerson

Sally Menke was the acclaimed editor of Tarantino's films up until her death in 2010. This video posted by Vimeo user Jim Emerson explains the techniques used by Menke in creating tension and how precise and thoughtful editing can have an affect on an audiences views and understanding of the characters thoughts and emotions towards others based upon the situations they are in. I also think that it is important to include evidence of Menke's effect on how Tarantino's films are viewed as she herself was a female the director grew very fond of and most likely drew inspiration from for the development of his female characters.

Essays:

Item 12

In this Essay produced by a film studies student, Tarantino's use of strong female characters is analysed and linked to why he could be and is often considered an auteur.

Interviews

Item 13
'Quentin Tarantino On His Character from PULP FICTION: Mia Wallace - AFI Interview (2009)

In this brief segment of an interview with AFI, Tarantino mentions why Mia Wallace is a mysterious character to the audience. It also suggests potential reasoning's for Tarantino to have wanted to replicate this setup in Kill Bill.

Item 14
El Rey Network's 'The Directors Chair: Quentin Tarantino: Part 2' (2014)

In this Robert Rodrigues interview of Tarantino, the director discusses new topics such as his need to write his own films starting from "The blank page". This interview is great for discussion of this topic as Tarantino continuously expresses his reasons for wanting to be what I would deem as a true auteur of film. It is also my opinion that this is great material to enhance my presentation as it shows never before seen footage of Tarantino directing his actors, such as Thurman and Grier on set.

Item 15
Charlie Rose Interview (2012)
In this interview, Tarantino explains how Terry Gilliam taught him a lesson on how to have his vision come through to the audience and in affect be viewed as an auteur. He states how his job as a director is to direct others: to surround himself with those who are the best at what they do, such as his actors, and can achieve these elements he desires by themselves.

Item 16
Pam Grier GQ Interview 2012.

Book's

Item 17
'Quintessential Tarantino' - By Edwin Page

This book notes how Jackie Brown was a departure for Tarantino as it was of a slower-pace than his previous films yet also introduced a previously lacking female lead character. The book also notes that the use of a African American female lead in a crime-based action drama defies genre convention, an element of postmodernism displayed by Tarantino. The book summaries that through his use of postmodernism elements such as this, he delivers a specific style of cinematic entertainment, a brand of movie which is clearly identifiable. "This is auteurism"{Page 22}.


Rejected Items

Item 18
'True Romance' (1993) - Written by Quentin Tarantino, Directed by Tony Scott
I have decided to not include this film due to its vision being altered by Tony Scott, similarly to how Tarantino changed elements of Rum Punch.

Item 19
Cannes 2014 Film Festival Q&A
In this panel discussion, Tarantino expresses his desire to make films as an auteur despite a desire to also entertain his audience. However, he does not talk enough about his collaborations with actors which is necessary to answer my hypothesis.

Item 20

I have rejected this interview as I feel that it focused more